Agile tried it
It ended up as theater, because authority was never actually delegated. Trust is hard to build when building it risks people's jobs and takes their power away.
Operating model & governance design · Zürich
Most change fails on structure, not technology, and AI is only the newest test of it. Lead2Coach redesigns the operating model that produced the failure, and coaches the leaders who have to run it afterwards.

Why we exist
It ended up as theater, because authority was never actually delegated. Trust is hard to build when building it risks people's jobs and takes their power away.
Without the budget or the understanding to change the system itself, the chart moves, and the same system comes back under new names.
Most organizations do not have the culture or the structure for people to grow with AI, so they compete with it on the same work instead.
So we work on what is possible and realistic: how to navigate it, and how to move one step at a time.
70%
of transformations fall short. The operating model, not the technology, decides.
BCG · 2020
Who this is for
The same problem from opposite ends. What differs is where the work starts.
Run from the inside rather than advised from across a table: an engineering organization from 60 to 130 people across four products, and the product function built from nothing.
A global solution management programme, now an official programme in the Bayer Radiology Academy, and AI transformation running inside one of the world's largest insurers.
What you can buy
Three practices, one craft: leaders who understand the system they are in, and can move it. Leading a change, shipping the work and taking a new idea to commercial all run into the same structure.
Digital, and done as pre-work, so day one starts from what your organization actually looks like rather than from introductions.
The starting point for every engagement, and sometimes the whole of it. It is a real piece of work, not a sales meeting.
Scoped after the workshop rather than before it, because the honest size of the work is not knowable until the first two steps have run.
The two short reads on the method page are that diagnostic in miniature, and free.
Leaders and teams who carry the change without us in the room.
Delivery that holds, and a product function that owns the outcome.
Teams that take an idea all the way to commercial.
AI, and where the line is
How an organization decides, what it rewards and where its capacity goes set the ceiling. Not the technology. The age of that thesis is worth being plain about: the AI application began in 2025 and has no portfolio of references behind it yet. The structural practice underneath it is where every case on this site comes from.
4 in 10
firms making significant AI investments report no business gains.
MIT SMR / BCG · 3,000+ managers
40%
of agentic AI projects will be scrapped by 2027.
forecastGartner · 2025
Every practice ends the same way: capability that stays after we leave. The software a champion uses to hold the portfolio is Aptavo, and it is a separate product.
Our principles
Tracked behaviors, individual experiences, observable patterns.
Tracked behaviorSentiment surveys
Call things as they are. Set clear intentions.
Named trade-offsConsensus theater
Hypothesis-driven interventions. Fast feedback loops. Measurable results.
100-day cycles18-month roadmaps
Credentials
The short version. The work itself, the references and both CVs are on one page, because that is the page for them.
Next
Tell us the decision that keeps not getting made, and who would have to agree to it. That is enough for a first conversation.